A
Auto Express
Guest
This was all set to be the year of the electric car, before recent global events threw a big spanner in the works of the automotive sector, not to mention every other area of society. The industry believes the COVID-19 pandemic could seriously affect production, with as many as 200,000 fewer cars rolling out of UK factories.
The situation means the launch of many new small electric models will be put on hold, but two did hit the UK market before lockdown – and we put them together in a head-to-head test.
They’re the new Renault Zoe and MINI Electric, two EV superminis that are going after the same customer, who is looking for eco-friendly urban transport with low running costs.
This is the Mk2 Zoe, so Renault has experience when it comes to electric cars. But apart from a few experimental MINI Es in 2010, this is MINI’s first adventure into all-electric production, so we’ll see which model is the best compact EV.
This second-generation Zoe takes Renault’s experience with its past EVs and packages it in a fresher and more practical car that is packed with extra technology. At £29,695 this top-spec i GT Line R135 is pricier than the MINI, but is it worth it?
Renault Zoe
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Design & engineering
The new Zoe uses an adapted version of the original car’s platform, so there are MacPherson struts at the front and a torsion beam at the rear; nothing new there. Instead, the big advances have come in its powertrain.
The battery is still sandwiched in the model’s floor and under the rear seats, but there’s more energy density now, so it packs 52kWh of usable capacity.
While there’s only one choice of battery, there are two choices of electric motor. The first – the R110 – offers 107bhp, but it’s the R135 that we’re testing here, which packs a 133bhp and 245Nm punch.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
This is still down on the MINI’s claimed outputs, but because the Zoe’s battery is bigger than its competitor’s, it means there’s much more range on offer, at a claimed 238 miles, according to Renault.
Range is key to any EV, and charging goes hand in hand with this. But it’s a mixed bag here for the Zoe; the Renault has some real positives, such as its Chameleon Charger that allows the car to always charge at the maximum power available, saving time and money. However, CCS DC rapid charging isn’t standard, unlike on the MINI, so you’ll have to fork out an extra £1,000 for this option even on the top-spec i GT Line trim. It is necessary in this day and age given the increasing rate rapid chargers are popping up; it also makes the car more versatile.
It’s the only real option you should need, because GT Line gets lots of standard kit, including a 9.3-inch touchscreen with nav, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, wireless smartphone charging, climate and cruise control, a 10-inch digital dash, parking sensors, a rear camera and even part-recycled upholstery.
The interior is fine, if a bit blander than the MINI’s, but it’s the driving position that’s worse; you sit high up, which does at least mean visibility is good, but you can’t adjust the seat height.
Driving
Soft suspension means the Zoe is compliant and relatively comfortable, which makes it great around town, soaking up the scars on urban roads. That softness means it feels less tied down on sweeping roads out of town, and the higher seating position exacerbates the top-heavy feel, because there is quite a bit of roll. But this isn’t designed to be a sporty small car; it’s an all-electric supermini that focuses on comfort and around-town performance, so in that respect the Renault fulfils its brief nicely.
The steering is light, so it’s easy to manoeuvre, and the power delivery is smooth. Instant torque means it’s best off the line to 30mph, where the Zoe recorded a time of 3.2 seconds in our tests, 0.3 seconds behind the MINI. Yet the acceleration tails off beyond about 45mph, and the cars’ 0-60mph times showed this; the Zoe took 9.2 seconds, the MINI 6.7 seconds.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
You’d never call the Zoe slow, though. Compared with a 1.0-litre supermini, its performance is better and more easily accessible, thanks in part to the single-speed automatic transmission. It’s more than adequate, and the electric powertrain is also superbly quiet. The refinement matches this because there’s not much suspension or road noise, and wind noise is kept at bay, too. It’s an impressive package.
Practicality
The Renault puts clear ground between itself and the MINI for usability. The Zoe is a five-door and the MINI is only available as a three-door, so access to the rear seats is much easier. There’s more room, too, while the Renault’s taller roofline means headroom is good, and because you sit higher up on top of the battery, this brings your legs back towards you and creates more legroom.
The 338-litre boot is also larger and close to some superminis’. In fact, the packaging is good, with the electric-car architecture making the most of storage.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
With EVs, practicality is as much about charging. Forget the three-pin plug; that’s only for emergencies. Otherwise, the car’s Chameleon Charger helps here. With a 7.4kW wallbox supply, a full charge takes nine hours and 25 minutes, so overnight charges should be fine. With a 22kW A/C supply, this drops to three hours. Spec the DC rapid-charge option, and an 80 per cent top-up with a 50kW supply takes 70 minutes.
Ownership
There should be no doubts about reliability, because the tech is proven. The Zoe is covered by an eight-year/ 100,000-mile battery warranty, while the rest of the car has five years/100,000 miles of cover. Renault also beat MINI in our Driver Power 2020 poll (see Page 28), taking 15th place in the manufacturers’ charts compared with the British brand’s 26th spot.
There’s a lot of safety kit, too, with autonomous braking, blind-spot and lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist and traffic-sign recognition. Euro NCAP hasn’t yet tested this second-generation car.
Running costs
This is where both EVs excel. We’ll base our running costs on home charging, with an average energy price of 14.4p per kWh. Use the public charging network and your costs could increase. At home the Zoe’s battery will cost £7.92 to fully charge, and based on an average efficiency of 3.7 miles per kWh, you’ll get a real-world range of 192 miles. This equates to just over 4p per mile.
With less usable energy in its battery, at 28.9kWh, the MINI costs £4.69 to charge. It returned efficiency of 3.6 miles per kWh, so close to the Zoe, even if this means a real-world range of 104 miles, according to our figures. This equates to a cost per mile of 4.5p. A little more than its rival, but over 20,000 miles you’ll only spend an extra £22 on electricity, at £800 a year.
Testers’ notes
“The Zoe’s charging port is located under the Renault badge in the centre of the car at the front. The MINI’s charge port is where the petrol car’s fuel filler would be; this isn’t quite as practical, unfortunately.”
MINI Electric
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Like the Zoe, MINI’s new Electric model is targeting buyers who are looking for a compact electric car that’s still relatively affordable. This Level 2 model costs £26,900, so it’s cheaper than its rival from Renault – but that’s not the full story.
Design & engineering
While the MINI Electric in Level 2 trim undercuts the top-spec Zoe, if you stepped up to the range-topping Level 3 MINI the tables are turned in the Zoe’s favour, albeit it to a slightly lesser degree
There’s a similar level of kit, too. Level 2 has parking sensors and a reversing camera, climate and cruise control, keyless operation and LED lights. There’s the latest smartphone connectivity and a digital dash, so the equipment specs aren’t too different.
However, Level 3 trim only really adds front parking sensors, an upgraded stereo, a panoramic sunroof, leather trim and a larger infotainment screen, so Level 2 is definitely the best bet.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Where there is a big difference between the two test cars is in their mechanical and electronic specs. All MINI Electrics get the same lithium-ion battery, with 28.9kWh of usable energy, which is significantly less than the Zoe. This energy feeds an electric motor on the front axle that delivers 181bhp and 270Nm of torque, which is quite a bit more than the Renault.
The electric variant is adapted from the MINI architecture, so the suspension layout is the same as the Cooper’s, for example, which means struts at the front and a multi-link axle at the rear, unlike the Zoe. This has many positives for the driving experience.
There’s a 50kW DC rapid-charging capability as standard here, so you don’t have to fork out extra for quicker recharges, but the downside is that given the MINI’s smaller battery, you might need to make more frequent use of this than in the Zoe.
The interior is familiar and quality feels good, as in all MINIs. It’s not necessarily better than the Zoe, just different. The Renault feels more like a bespoke cabin design for an EV; the MINI is like a MINI, just with a few extra touches, such as the digital display behind the steering wheel. At least that means the model’s ergonomics and driving position are as good as ever.
Driving
Those similarities extend to the driving experience, because the MINI Electric handles with the same broad sense of keenness and agility as a standard Cooper; it’s just that the extra weight of the battery (even if it is kept low in the car) dulls that by a noticeable amount.
But the MINI is much more alert than the Zoe. Its steering is quicker, weightier and more precise, and there’s more grip, too. It means the MINI feels much more fun to drive. That’s helped by the performance, because there’s much more on offer here, as our test figures show. The MINI sprinted from 0-30mph in 2.9 seconds, but it really asserted its advantage over the Renault from 0-60mph, where it clocked 6.7 seconds, which was 2.5 seconds less than the Zoe.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
With only one gear in both cars, it’s simply a case of dropping them into D and accelerating, but to give you an idea of how much faster the MINI is, it sprinted from 50 to 70mph in the time the Zoe took to go from 30 to 50mph – 3.4 seconds. The Renault took 5.5 seconds from 50 to 70mph, for reference.
One area where the MINI’s extra weight over the standard car is a positive is the ride. That mass helps to just take the jiggly, firm edge off the ride that you find in a normal Cooper. It’s still not as soft or quite as comfortable as the Zoe, but the damping does feel nicely set up and the MINI controls its weight well over bumps. Refinement is good too, so there’s very little to split these two cars when it comes to noise around town or on the motorway.
Practicality
The real difference between them is range. According to our efficiency figures, the MINI will only cover a real-world 104 miles on a full battery, whereas the Renault should travel 192 miles on a charge. That means the MINI can only manage 54 per cent of the Zoe’s overall range, which has a big bearing on usability.
At least charging the MINI up will be okay, because an 80 per cent charge using a 50kW rapid charger will take 35 minutes. This drops to three and a half hours using an 11kW AC feed, and four hours 12 minutes for a 7.4kW supply from a home wallbox. With a smaller battery, it stands to reason the MINI will take less time to charge up.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Yet the boot is also smaller, at 211 litres. This is 127 litres less than the Zoe’s capacity, while the MINI Electric is only available as a three-door, so access to the rear seats isn’t as easy as it is with the Renault. It’s also much tighter when you’re sat in the back.
Ownership
The MINI brand fared relatively poorly in our most recent Driver Power survey (Page 28), taking 26th spot out of 30 brands and while the battery warranty is identical to the Zoe’s, at eight years/100,000 miles, the standard three-year unlimited-mileage warranty package isn’t quite as good as Renault’s.
Safety kit isn’t either, because while the MINI gets autonomous braking as standard, blind-spot warning and lane-keep assist aren’t included, and there’s no opportunity to add them as options.
Running costs
The MINI brand does have its appeal though, especially on the used market. Our experts predict that the MINI will retain a strong 49.1 per cent of its new value, losing £13,697 in depreciation, whereas the Renault is expected to retain just 42 per cent, so depreciation works out at £17,229 over the same three-year/36,000-mile ownership period.
There’s some great news if you’re a business user too, as company car drivers will pay no Benefit-in-Kind tax on electric cars for the 2020/2021 tax year.
Testers’ notes
“While you can choose wheels like our test car’s as a no-cost option, we’d go for the standard ‘Electric spoke’ plug design because they’re a really cool styling feature that look great.”
Verdict
First place: Renault Zoe
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
The result of this test – and which model is a better EV – really comes down to range. Both cars are convincing, but although it’s pricier, the Renault gets more kit, while the fact it can travel nearly twice as far on a charge makes a massive difference. Even though it’s not as fun as the MINI, it’s much more practical and usable, is just as comfortable, and the tech is good. It’ll cost slightly less to run, too.
Second place: MINI Electric
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
The MINI image is still great, especially as an electric car. It retains the brand’s fun-factor when it comes to the driving experience and it’s comfortable and efficient, too. But as an EV, its range is too limited for it to triumph over the Zoe. We like the car, but its limited practicality here – including boot space, passenger room and cruising range – is a big drawback to the MINI Electric’s appeal.
Also consider...
Peugeot e-208
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Model: Peugeot e-208 Allure
Price: £26,900
Engine: 1 x e-motor, 134bhp
The e-208 is Peugeot’s effort at an EV supermini. Its 50kWh battery gives a claimed range of 217 miles, while it has as much power as the Zoe. Allure trim gets all the equipment you need and is well priced, while the 311-litre boot is competitive.
Nissan Leaf
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Model: Nissan Leaf 40kWh N-Connecta
Price: £28,145
Engine: 1 x e-motor, 148bhp
For similar money you could buy a Nissan Leaf with lots of tech, a 40kWh battery giving a range of 168 miles and, more importantly, extra space and practicality over supermini EVs. There’s some good safety and connectivity features on this trim level.
Figures
Continue reading...
The situation means the launch of many new small electric models will be put on hold, but two did hit the UK market before lockdown – and we put them together in a head-to-head test.
They’re the new Renault Zoe and MINI Electric, two EV superminis that are going after the same customer, who is looking for eco-friendly urban transport with low running costs.
This is the Mk2 Zoe, so Renault has experience when it comes to electric cars. But apart from a few experimental MINI Es in 2010, this is MINI’s first adventure into all-electric production, so we’ll see which model is the best compact EV.
This second-generation Zoe takes Renault’s experience with its past EVs and packages it in a fresher and more practical car that is packed with extra technology. At £29,695 this top-spec i GT Line R135 is pricier than the MINI, but is it worth it?
Renault Zoe
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
| Model: | Renault Zoe i GT Line R135 Z.E. 50 |
| Price: | £29,695 |
| Powertrain: | 1 x e-motor/lithium-ion battery, 133bhp |
| 0-60mph: | 9.2 seconds |
| Test economy: | 3.7 miles/kWh |
| CO2: | 0g/km |
| Annual road tax: | £0 |
Design & engineering
The new Zoe uses an adapted version of the original car’s platform, so there are MacPherson struts at the front and a torsion beam at the rear; nothing new there. Instead, the big advances have come in its powertrain.
The battery is still sandwiched in the model’s floor and under the rear seats, but there’s more energy density now, so it packs 52kWh of usable capacity.
While there’s only one choice of battery, there are two choices of electric motor. The first – the R110 – offers 107bhp, but it’s the R135 that we’re testing here, which packs a 133bhp and 245Nm punch.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
This is still down on the MINI’s claimed outputs, but because the Zoe’s battery is bigger than its competitor’s, it means there’s much more range on offer, at a claimed 238 miles, according to Renault.
Range is key to any EV, and charging goes hand in hand with this. But it’s a mixed bag here for the Zoe; the Renault has some real positives, such as its Chameleon Charger that allows the car to always charge at the maximum power available, saving time and money. However, CCS DC rapid charging isn’t standard, unlike on the MINI, so you’ll have to fork out an extra £1,000 for this option even on the top-spec i GT Line trim. It is necessary in this day and age given the increasing rate rapid chargers are popping up; it also makes the car more versatile.
It’s the only real option you should need, because GT Line gets lots of standard kit, including a 9.3-inch touchscreen with nav, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, wireless smartphone charging, climate and cruise control, a 10-inch digital dash, parking sensors, a rear camera and even part-recycled upholstery.
The interior is fine, if a bit blander than the MINI’s, but it’s the driving position that’s worse; you sit high up, which does at least mean visibility is good, but you can’t adjust the seat height.
Driving
Soft suspension means the Zoe is compliant and relatively comfortable, which makes it great around town, soaking up the scars on urban roads. That softness means it feels less tied down on sweeping roads out of town, and the higher seating position exacerbates the top-heavy feel, because there is quite a bit of roll. But this isn’t designed to be a sporty small car; it’s an all-electric supermini that focuses on comfort and around-town performance, so in that respect the Renault fulfils its brief nicely.
The steering is light, so it’s easy to manoeuvre, and the power delivery is smooth. Instant torque means it’s best off the line to 30mph, where the Zoe recorded a time of 3.2 seconds in our tests, 0.3 seconds behind the MINI. Yet the acceleration tails off beyond about 45mph, and the cars’ 0-60mph times showed this; the Zoe took 9.2 seconds, the MINI 6.7 seconds.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
You’d never call the Zoe slow, though. Compared with a 1.0-litre supermini, its performance is better and more easily accessible, thanks in part to the single-speed automatic transmission. It’s more than adequate, and the electric powertrain is also superbly quiet. The refinement matches this because there’s not much suspension or road noise, and wind noise is kept at bay, too. It’s an impressive package.
Practicality
The Renault puts clear ground between itself and the MINI for usability. The Zoe is a five-door and the MINI is only available as a three-door, so access to the rear seats is much easier. There’s more room, too, while the Renault’s taller roofline means headroom is good, and because you sit higher up on top of the battery, this brings your legs back towards you and creates more legroom.
The 338-litre boot is also larger and close to some superminis’. In fact, the packaging is good, with the electric-car architecture making the most of storage.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
With EVs, practicality is as much about charging. Forget the three-pin plug; that’s only for emergencies. Otherwise, the car’s Chameleon Charger helps here. With a 7.4kW wallbox supply, a full charge takes nine hours and 25 minutes, so overnight charges should be fine. With a 22kW A/C supply, this drops to three hours. Spec the DC rapid-charge option, and an 80 per cent top-up with a 50kW supply takes 70 minutes.
Ownership
There should be no doubts about reliability, because the tech is proven. The Zoe is covered by an eight-year/ 100,000-mile battery warranty, while the rest of the car has five years/100,000 miles of cover. Renault also beat MINI in our Driver Power 2020 poll (see Page 28), taking 15th place in the manufacturers’ charts compared with the British brand’s 26th spot.
There’s a lot of safety kit, too, with autonomous braking, blind-spot and lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist and traffic-sign recognition. Euro NCAP hasn’t yet tested this second-generation car.
Running costs
This is where both EVs excel. We’ll base our running costs on home charging, with an average energy price of 14.4p per kWh. Use the public charging network and your costs could increase. At home the Zoe’s battery will cost £7.92 to fully charge, and based on an average efficiency of 3.7 miles per kWh, you’ll get a real-world range of 192 miles. This equates to just over 4p per mile.
With less usable energy in its battery, at 28.9kWh, the MINI costs £4.69 to charge. It returned efficiency of 3.6 miles per kWh, so close to the Zoe, even if this means a real-world range of 104 miles, according to our figures. This equates to a cost per mile of 4.5p. A little more than its rival, but over 20,000 miles you’ll only spend an extra £22 on electricity, at £800 a year.
Testers’ notes
“The Zoe’s charging port is located under the Renault badge in the centre of the car at the front. The MINI’s charge port is where the petrol car’s fuel filler would be; this isn’t quite as practical, unfortunately.”
MINI Electric
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
| Model: | MINI Electric Level 2 |
| Price: | £26,900 |
| Powertrain: | 1 x e-motor/lithium-ion battery, 181bhp |
| 0-60mph: | 6.7 seconds |
| Test economy: | 3.6 miles/kWh |
| CO2: | 0g/km |
| Annual road tax: | £0 |
Like the Zoe, MINI’s new Electric model is targeting buyers who are looking for a compact electric car that’s still relatively affordable. This Level 2 model costs £26,900, so it’s cheaper than its rival from Renault – but that’s not the full story.
Design & engineering
While the MINI Electric in Level 2 trim undercuts the top-spec Zoe, if you stepped up to the range-topping Level 3 MINI the tables are turned in the Zoe’s favour, albeit it to a slightly lesser degree
There’s a similar level of kit, too. Level 2 has parking sensors and a reversing camera, climate and cruise control, keyless operation and LED lights. There’s the latest smartphone connectivity and a digital dash, so the equipment specs aren’t too different.
However, Level 3 trim only really adds front parking sensors, an upgraded stereo, a panoramic sunroof, leather trim and a larger infotainment screen, so Level 2 is definitely the best bet.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Where there is a big difference between the two test cars is in their mechanical and electronic specs. All MINI Electrics get the same lithium-ion battery, with 28.9kWh of usable energy, which is significantly less than the Zoe. This energy feeds an electric motor on the front axle that delivers 181bhp and 270Nm of torque, which is quite a bit more than the Renault.
The electric variant is adapted from the MINI architecture, so the suspension layout is the same as the Cooper’s, for example, which means struts at the front and a multi-link axle at the rear, unlike the Zoe. This has many positives for the driving experience.
There’s a 50kW DC rapid-charging capability as standard here, so you don’t have to fork out extra for quicker recharges, but the downside is that given the MINI’s smaller battery, you might need to make more frequent use of this than in the Zoe.
The interior is familiar and quality feels good, as in all MINIs. It’s not necessarily better than the Zoe, just different. The Renault feels more like a bespoke cabin design for an EV; the MINI is like a MINI, just with a few extra touches, such as the digital display behind the steering wheel. At least that means the model’s ergonomics and driving position are as good as ever.
Driving
Those similarities extend to the driving experience, because the MINI Electric handles with the same broad sense of keenness and agility as a standard Cooper; it’s just that the extra weight of the battery (even if it is kept low in the car) dulls that by a noticeable amount.
But the MINI is much more alert than the Zoe. Its steering is quicker, weightier and more precise, and there’s more grip, too. It means the MINI feels much more fun to drive. That’s helped by the performance, because there’s much more on offer here, as our test figures show. The MINI sprinted from 0-30mph in 2.9 seconds, but it really asserted its advantage over the Renault from 0-60mph, where it clocked 6.7 seconds, which was 2.5 seconds less than the Zoe.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
With only one gear in both cars, it’s simply a case of dropping them into D and accelerating, but to give you an idea of how much faster the MINI is, it sprinted from 50 to 70mph in the time the Zoe took to go from 30 to 50mph – 3.4 seconds. The Renault took 5.5 seconds from 50 to 70mph, for reference.
One area where the MINI’s extra weight over the standard car is a positive is the ride. That mass helps to just take the jiggly, firm edge off the ride that you find in a normal Cooper. It’s still not as soft or quite as comfortable as the Zoe, but the damping does feel nicely set up and the MINI controls its weight well over bumps. Refinement is good too, so there’s very little to split these two cars when it comes to noise around town or on the motorway.
Practicality
The real difference between them is range. According to our efficiency figures, the MINI will only cover a real-world 104 miles on a full battery, whereas the Renault should travel 192 miles on a charge. That means the MINI can only manage 54 per cent of the Zoe’s overall range, which has a big bearing on usability.
At least charging the MINI up will be okay, because an 80 per cent charge using a 50kW rapid charger will take 35 minutes. This drops to three and a half hours using an 11kW AC feed, and four hours 12 minutes for a 7.4kW supply from a home wallbox. With a smaller battery, it stands to reason the MINI will take less time to charge up.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Yet the boot is also smaller, at 211 litres. This is 127 litres less than the Zoe’s capacity, while the MINI Electric is only available as a three-door, so access to the rear seats isn’t as easy as it is with the Renault. It’s also much tighter when you’re sat in the back.
Ownership
The MINI brand fared relatively poorly in our most recent Driver Power survey (Page 28), taking 26th spot out of 30 brands and while the battery warranty is identical to the Zoe’s, at eight years/100,000 miles, the standard three-year unlimited-mileage warranty package isn’t quite as good as Renault’s.
Safety kit isn’t either, because while the MINI gets autonomous braking as standard, blind-spot warning and lane-keep assist aren’t included, and there’s no opportunity to add them as options.
Running costs
The MINI brand does have its appeal though, especially on the used market. Our experts predict that the MINI will retain a strong 49.1 per cent of its new value, losing £13,697 in depreciation, whereas the Renault is expected to retain just 42 per cent, so depreciation works out at £17,229 over the same three-year/36,000-mile ownership period.
There’s some great news if you’re a business user too, as company car drivers will pay no Benefit-in-Kind tax on electric cars for the 2020/2021 tax year.
Testers’ notes
“While you can choose wheels like our test car’s as a no-cost option, we’d go for the standard ‘Electric spoke’ plug design because they’re a really cool styling feature that look great.”
Verdict
First place: Renault Zoe
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
The result of this test – and which model is a better EV – really comes down to range. Both cars are convincing, but although it’s pricier, the Renault gets more kit, while the fact it can travel nearly twice as far on a charge makes a massive difference. Even though it’s not as fun as the MINI, it’s much more practical and usable, is just as comfortable, and the tech is good. It’ll cost slightly less to run, too.
Second place: MINI Electric
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
The MINI image is still great, especially as an electric car. It retains the brand’s fun-factor when it comes to the driving experience and it’s comfortable and efficient, too. But as an EV, its range is too limited for it to triumph over the Zoe. We like the car, but its limited practicality here – including boot space, passenger room and cruising range – is a big drawback to the MINI Electric’s appeal.
Also consider...
Peugeot e-208
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Model: Peugeot e-208 Allure
Price: £26,900
Engine: 1 x e-motor, 134bhp
The e-208 is Peugeot’s effort at an EV supermini. Its 50kWh battery gives a claimed range of 217 miles, while it has as much power as the Zoe. Allure trim gets all the equipment you need and is well priced, while the 311-litre boot is competitive.
Nissan Leaf
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Model: Nissan Leaf 40kWh N-Connecta
Price: £28,145
Engine: 1 x e-motor, 148bhp
For similar money you could buy a Nissan Leaf with lots of tech, a 40kWh battery giving a range of 168 miles and, more importantly, extra space and practicality over supermini EVs. There’s some good safety and connectivity features on this trim level.
Figures
| Renault Zoe i GT Line R135 Z.E. 50 | MINI Electric Level 2 | |
| On the road price/total as tested | £29,695/£30,945 | £26,900/£26,900 |
| Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000) | £12,466/42.0% | £13,203/49.1% |
| Depreciation | £17,229 | £13,697 |
| Annual tax liability std/higher rate | £0/£0 | £0/£0 |
| Annual electricity cost (12k/20k miles) | £467/£778 | £480/£800 |
| Insurance group/quote/road tax cost | 22/£535/£0 | 22/£797/£0 |
| Servicing costs | £449 (3 years) | TBC |
| Length/wheelbase | 4,087/2,588mm | 3,845/2,495mm |
| Height/width | 1,562/1,787mm | 1,432/1,727mm |
| Powertrain | 1 x electric motor/lithium-ion battery | 1 x electric motor/lithium-ion battery |
| Peak power/revs | 133/4,200 bhp/rpm | 181/7,000 bhp/rpm |
| Peak torque/revs | 245/1,500 Nm/rpm | 270/100 Nm/rpm |
| Transmission | Single-speed auto/fwd | Single-speed auto/fwd |
| Battery capacity/usable | 55/52kWh | 32.6/28.9kWh |
| Boot capacity (seats up/down) | 338/1,225 litres | 211/731 litres |
| Kerbweight/payload | 1,502/486kg | 1,365/405kg |
| Turning circle | 10.6 metres | 10.7 metres |
| Basic warranty (miles)/recovery | 5 yrs (100,000)/3yrs | 3 yrs (unlimited)/3yrs |
| Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos. | 19th*/26th** | 26th*/21st** |
| NCAP: Adult/child/ped./assist/stars | TBC | 79/73/66/56/4*** |
| 0-30/0-60mph | 3.2/9.2 secs | 2.9/6.7 secs |
| 30-50mph | 3.4 secs | 2.2 secs |
| 50-70mph | 5.5 secs | 3.4 secs |
| Top speed | 87mph | 93mph |
| Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph | 48.4/35.4/9.8m | 47.8/35.7/9.7m |
| Auto Express econ./predicted range | 3.7 miles/kWh/192 miles | 3.6 miles/kWh/104 miles |
| Claimed range (WLTP) | 238 miles | 144 miles |
| Charging capability | 2.3/7.4/22/50kW | 7.4/11/50kW |
| Charging time | 34h30m/9h25m/3/1h10m | 4h12m/3h30m/35m |
| Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket | 0/0g/km/0% | 0/0g/km/0% |
| Airbags/Isofix/parking sensors/cam | Four/yes/yes/yes | Six/yes/yes/yes |
| Auto box/lane-keep/blind-spot/AEB | Yes/yes/yes/yes | Yes/no/no/yes |
| Clim./cruise ctrl/leather/heated seats | Yes/yes/no/£750^ | Yes/yes/no/yes |
| Met paint/LEDs/keyless/pwr tailgate | £560/no/yes/no | Yes/yes/yes/no |
| Nav/digi dash/DAB/connected apps | Yes/yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/yes/yes |
| Wireless charge/CarPlay/Android Auto | Yes/yes/yes | No/yes/yes |
Continue reading...